linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/locks.c: prepare for BKL removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100920160729.96872d12.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:07:29 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, gregf@...newdream.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/locks.c: prepare for BKL removal

On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net> wrote:
>
> I suspect the easiest thing is to leave Ceph out of this stage of your 
> series, I'll switch lock_kernel() to lock_flocks() once that exists 
> upstream.  Unless there is a better way? 

Maybe someone could write a trivial implementation of lock_flocks() (i.e.
one that does not make any changes to behaviour) and ask Linus to take it
now in preparation for the next merge window (he has done that before).
That way, more of this could be put into individual other trees and avoid
more conflicts ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped