[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1009202223450.19429@axis700.grange>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:27:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>
cc: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bernie Thompson <bernie@...gable.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch, RFC] Make struct fb_info ref-counted with kref
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> On Mon, 20 September 2010 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> > Of course, the optimal solution would be to design and implement a
> > mechanism to notify framebuffer users about a changed fb configuration,
> > but we're not that far yet...
>
> This would include ABI change for userspace, hard to get it trough...
> (except maybe if userspace has to opt-in for the notification and kernel
> can thus differentiate the "old" and "new" users)
Yes, something like that...
> But how would you handle userspace apps that can't consume notifications right
> away? Do you timeout or risk long stalls?
In the same way as they're currently [1] handled: as long as there are
active fb-users, I reconfigure the physical interface but preserve the
user configuration, i.e., I either display the smaller user framebuffer on
a part of the larger display or a part of the larger user framebuffer on
the whole smaller display.
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/8751
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists