[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1009201642310.1306-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:55:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
cc: Mat <jackdachef@...il.com>,
Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>, Alan Ott <alan@...nal11.us>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Bombe <aeb@...ian.org>,
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@...il.com>,
Phil Turmel <philip@...mel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG, Regression, bisected] USB mouse causes bug on 1st insert,
ignored on 2nd insert, lsusb stuck at usbdev_open
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Thanks Matt and Phill for confirming the line that triggers the oops. As I
> am not able to reproduce it myself, it's a bit tricky to track down what
> went wrong.
>
> Could you please apply the patch below? It's printing the hid <-> hiddev
> <-> usb_interface connections at various stages of probing and open.
> Hopefully it'll reveal a little bit what goes wrong and where.
Jiri:
There's something very fishy going on here. Even more so than these
bug reports suggest.
The whole business about hiddev_driver in hiddev.c looks bogus. It
doesn't get used for anything and it never binds to an interface.
Which means that the usb_find_interface call in hiddev_open should
never succeed. At the very least it would need to specify hid_driver
instead of hiddev_driver.
I have no idea what's really happening. Can you figure it out?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists