linux-kernel - Re: ahci rmmodable and shouldn't

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C9729D7.70500@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:31:03 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Pedro Francisco <pedrogfrancisco@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ahci rmmodable and shouldn't

Hello,

On 09/20/2010 11:25 AM, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> Discomfort? Not really, sorry if my stubbornness felt like it. No, I'm
> fine with it.

:-)

> I just thought it was weird the change of behaviour from 2.6.32, plus
> felt that the "Used by" field by lsmod was incorrectly set at 0 since
> the module is, in fact, being used (e)

Hmmm... I don't recall the behavior changing from 2.6.32.  Maybe I've
been just speaking bullshit this whole time.  Can you please post the
output of lsmod?  Maybe the difference is caused by the split between
libahci and ahci?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/