lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C972F98.4050709@panasas.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:55:36 +0200
From:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
CC:	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
	Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tcm: Add native 32-byte CDB support

On 09/20/2010 10:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 13:55 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On 09/17/2010 07:34 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>>> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
>>>
>>> This patch adds a '#define TCM_MAX_COMMAND_SIZE 32' and converts all
>>> inline TCM core and subsystem CDB size defines to use TCM_MAX_COMMAND_SIZE
>>> instead of the 16-byte MAX_COMMAND_SIZE.  This includes the conversion of
>>> MAX_COMMAND_SIZE in certain places to use include/scsi/scsi.h:scsi_command_size()
>>> to properly extract the size of a received CDB based on opcode.
>>>
>>> This patch also includes the conversion of the FILEIO, IBLOCK, PSCSI, RAMDISK
>>> and STGT subsystem modules to use TCM_MAX_COMMAND_SIZE for their default
>>> internal inline CDB size.
>>>
>>> It also adds transport_lba_64_ext() and transport_get_sectors_32() callers
>>> into target_core_transport.c to be used for extracting a 64-bit logical
>>> block address and 32-bit transfer length (in block) from 32-byte CDBs.
>>> Finally this patch adds split_cdb_XX_32() and split_cdb_XX_32() for handling
>>> the generation of 32-byte CDBs for individual struct se_task.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/target/target_core_file.h      |    2 +-
>>>  drivers/target/target_core_iblock.h    |    2 +-
>>>  drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c     |    2 +-
>>>  drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.h     |    2 +-
>>>  drivers/target/target_core_rd.h        |    2 +-
>>>  drivers/target/target_core_scdb.c      |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/target/target_core_scdb.h      |    2 +
>>>  drivers/target/target_core_stgt.h      |    2 +-
>>>  drivers/target/target_core_transport.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>  include/target/target_core_base.h      |   13 +++++++++
>>>  10 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c b/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c
>>> index 803853d..beca807 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c
>>> @@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ static inline void pscsi_blk_init_request(
>>>  	 * Load the referenced struct se_task's SCSI CDB into
>>>  	 * include/linux/blkdev.h:struct request->cmd
>>>  	 */
>>> -	pt->pscsi_req->cmd_len = COMMAND_SIZE(pt->pscsi_cdb[0]);
>>> +	pt->pscsi_req->cmd_len = scsi_command_size(pt->pscsi_cdb);
>>>  	memcpy(pt->pscsi_req->cmd, pt->pscsi_cdb, pt->pscsi_req->cmd_len);
>>
>> Boom, only 16 bytes at req->cmd.
>>
>> For larger than 16 bytes commands at the block/scsi-ml level you need to:
>>
>> 	request->cmd = my_buffer_valid_until_complete;
>> 	request->cmd_len = scsi_command_size()
>>
>> if above "my_buffer_valid_until_complet" is always available you can just
>> do this regardless. If you need to dynamically allocate it (and deallocate)
>> then you should do an if > MAX_COMMAND_SIZE
>>
> 
> Hi Boaz,
> 
> I was pretty there was going to be some more work required on the
> TCM/PSCSI case for proper > 16 byte support, thanks for spotting this
> one.
> 
> So what I am thinking is that we can get rid of this memcpy() all
> together and just always use the per struct se_task allocated struct
> pscsi_plugin_task *pt->pscsi_cdb[] up to the new TCM_MAX_COMMAND_SIZE
> (32 bytes) for the request->cmd pointer.
> 
> Is there anything special that needs to be done in order to singal that
> struct request->cmd will be using *tp->pscsi_cdb[], and not struct
> request->__cmd[BLK_MAX_CMD]..?

No that's perfect.
The tricky part in other places is to keep it allocated through the life
cycle of the request. (And overriding the completion for de-allocation).
But here we have no problems, the governing pscsi_plugin_task is available
until after the request is complete, right?

> 
>>>  	/*
>>>  	 * Setup pointer for outgoing sense data.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.h b/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.h
>>> index db09d6a..086e6f1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.h
>>> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ extern int linux_blockdevice_check(int, int);
>>>  #include <linux/kobject.h>
>>>  
>>>  struct pscsi_plugin_task {
>>> -	unsigned char pscsi_cdb[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
>>> +	unsigned char pscsi_cdb[TCM_MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
>>>  	unsigned char pscsi_sense[SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE];
>>>  	int	pscsi_direction;
>>>  	int	pscsi_result;
>>
>> pscsi is when you directly Q to a scsi LLD via midlayer right? Note that most
>> scsi LLDs don't support > 16 or 12 bytes. The regular scsi despatch will check
>> this for you and return an error. How are these dispatched? blk_execute_rq* ?
>>
> 
> Correct on both points.  So all control path CDBs with PSCSI are treated
> as a passthrough.  The one special thing about pSCSI and struct request
> passthrough is wrt SCF_SCSI_DATA_SG_IO_CDB I/Os is that TCM Core will
> still handle the 1 -> N mapping of TCM struct se_task->task_sg[] across
> a single struct se_cmd->t_mem_list for received CDB sectors > underying
> HW max_sectors limitiations reported by pscsi_get_max_sectors().
> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.h b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.h
>>> index 8170b41..2008807 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.h
>>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ void rd_module_exit(void);
>>>  
>>>  struct rd_request {
>>>  	/* SCSI CDB from iSCSI Command PDU */
>>> -	unsigned char	rd_scsi_cdb[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
>>> +	unsigned char	rd_scsi_cdb[TCM_MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
>>>  	/* Data Direction */
>>>  	u8		rd_data_direction;
>>>  	/* Total length of request */
>>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_scdb.c b/drivers/target/target_core_scdb.c
>>> index 8bcfeaf..76a7de0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_scdb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_scdb.c
>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>>  
>>>  #include <linux/net.h>
>>>  #include <linux/string.h>
>>> +#include <scsi/scsi.h>
>>>  
>>>  #include <target/target_core_base.h>
>>>  #include <target/target_core_transport.h>
>>> @@ -147,3 +148,40 @@ void split_cdb_RW_16(
>>>  	cdb[0] = (rw) ? 0x8a : 0x88;
>>>  	split_cdb_XX_16(lba, sectors, &cdb[0]);
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + *	split_cdb_XX_32():
>>> + *	
>>> + * 	64-bit LBA w/ 32-bit SECTORS such as READ_32, WRITE_32 and XDWRITEREAD_32
>>> + */
>>> +void split_cdb_XX_32(
>>> +	unsigned long long lba,
>>> +	u32 *sectors,
>>> +	unsigned char *cdb)
>>> +{
>>> +	cdb[12] = (lba >> 56) & 0xff;
>>> +	cdb[13] = (lba >> 48) & 0xff;
>>> +	cdb[14] = (lba >> 40) & 0xff;
>>> +	cdb[15] = (lba >> 32) & 0xff;
>>> +	cdb[16] = (lba >> 24) & 0xff;
>>> +	cdb[17] = (lba >> 16) & 0xff;
>>> +	cdb[18] = (lba >> 8) & 0xff;
>>> +	cdb[19] = lba & 0xff;
>>
>> put_unaligned_be64
> 
> Ok, converting all functions these in target_core_scdb.c to use
> put_unaligned_be*().
> 
>>
>>> +	cdb[28] = (*sectors >> 24) & 0xff;
>>> +	cdb[29] = (*sectors >> 16) & 0xff;
>>> +	cdb[30] = (*sectors >> 8) & 0xff;
>>> +	cdb[31] = *sectors & 0xff;
>>
>> put_unaligned_be32
> 
> <nod>
> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
>>> index 49d5946..a3016f7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
>>> @@ -2636,7 +2636,8 @@ static int transport_process_control_sg_transform(
>>>  
>>>  	cdb = TRANSPORT(dev)->get_cdb(task);
>>>  	if (cdb)
>>> -		memcpy(cdb, T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb, MAX_COMMAND_SIZE);
>>> +		memcpy(cdb, T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb,
>>> +			scsi_command_size(T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb));
>>>  
>>>  	task->task_size = cmd->data_length;
>>>  	task->task_sg_num = 1;
>>> @@ -2677,7 +2678,8 @@ static int transport_process_control_nonsg_transform(
>>>  
>>>  	cdb = TRANSPORT(dev)->get_cdb(task);
>>>  	if (cdb)
>>> -		memcpy(cdb, T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb, MAX_COMMAND_SIZE);
>>> +		memcpy(cdb, T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb,
>>> +			scsi_command_size(T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb));
>>>  
>>>  	task->task_size = cmd->data_length;
>>>  	task->task_sg_num = 0;
>>> @@ -2711,7 +2713,8 @@ static int transport_process_non_data_transform(
>>>  
>>>  	cdb = TRANSPORT(dev)->get_cdb(task);
>>>  	if (cdb)
>>> -		memcpy(cdb, T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb, MAX_COMMAND_SIZE);
>>> +		memcpy(cdb, T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb,
>>> +			scsi_command_size(T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb));
>>>  
>>>  	task->task_size = cmd->data_length;
>>>  	task->task_sg_num = 0;
>>> @@ -2902,7 +2905,7 @@ int transport_generic_allocate_tasks(
>>>  	/*
>>>  	 * Copy the original CDB into T_TASK(cmd).
>>>  	 */
>>> -	memcpy(T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb, cdb, MAX_COMMAND_SIZE);
>>> +	memcpy(T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb, cdb, scsi_command_size(cdb));
>>
>> scsi_command_size can return up to 260 dependent on command. So you'll
>> need a min() to make sure. I'd do a tsk_cdb_cpy() wrapper that does
>> the proper min() for everyone. Later that wrapper can be made smarter
>> for large commands up to 260.
> 
> Hmmm actually, I am wondering if we need a method for the individual
> backstore to report the maximum supported CDB size on a TCM subsystem
> plugin basis, say via a caller include/target/target_core_transport.h:
> struct se_subsystem_api, and fail the extended CDB at TCM level for the
> pSCSI cases where struct scsi_host->max_cmd_len < scsi_command_size().
> 
> Also wrt to 260 byte CDBs for TCM/pSCSI and really everything received
> greater than the new default 32 for TCM_MAX_COMMAND_SIZE, this will
> require the extra allocation by TCM Core at both the
> T_TASK(cmd)->t_task_cdb[] as well as allowing pSCSI to handle this case.
> 

For me, (I'm not sure how hard it is. I still did not look, you know ;-))
I'd drop the allocation all together and just use a pointer and a size.
So for instance pSCSI can just pass along it's pointer and size, all the
way to the end and back. In something like iscsi the fixed 16 bytes can
just point to the received header, and with an extended cdb spill over
a buffer should be allocated, then de-allocated once command-response is
sent.
So basically allocated once in transport, passed around as pointer.
(BTW Same for sense buffer)

And by the way, I'd let the target reject un-known commands. It's a big
boy and it's easiest to add new code. No other places to change. (And
some fun things can be done, like target filtering). Passing the "size"
test says nothing, the actual command needs implementing. Just make sure
Error handling is solid. (The target already as a default: return error
case)

> I will look at implementing this soon, but I still need a way to test
> this code with TCM/PSCSI and scsi_debug..  Any ideas on where to look
> for doing this with > 32 byte CDBs..?
> 

That's easy. You have decided that TCM_MAX_COMMAND_SIZE == 32 and anything
bigger needs allocation. So for the duration of the test set
TCM_MAX_COMMAND_SIZE == 16 and see how these 32s get allocated.

or

How ready is target_core_stgt.h can you pass commands to user-space and
back. We can send OSD commands.

or

What if we use pscsi_plugin_task to send commands to an iscsi-initiator
device that's an OSD. A bit stupid as an admin point of view, but a grate
pass through exercise.

[osd-initiator] --net--> [(iscsi_tcm) - (pscsi_plugin_task) - (iscsi-initiator)] \
  --net--> [osd-target]

The [osd-initiator] and [osd-target] parts are easy.

Boaz

>>
>>>  	/*
>>>  	 * Check for SAM Task Attribute Emulation
>>>  	 */
>>> @@ -3829,6 +3832,19 @@ static inline unsigned long long transport_lba_64(unsigned char *cdb)
>>>  	return ((unsigned long long)__v2) | (unsigned long long)__v1 << 32;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +/*
>>> + * For VARIABLE_LENGTH_CDB w/ 32 byte extended CDBs
>>> + */
>>> +static inline unsigned long long transport_lba_64_ext(unsigned char *cdb)
>>> +{
>>> +	unsigned int __v1, __v2;
>>> +
>>> +	__v1 = (cdb[12] << 24) | (cdb[13] << 16) | (cdb[14] << 8) | cdb[15];
>>> +	__v2 = (cdb[16] << 24) | (cdb[17] << 16) | (cdb[18] << 8) | cdb[19];
>>> +
>>> +	return ((unsigned long long)__v2) | (unsigned long long)__v1 << 32;
>>
>> get_unaligned_be64(&cdb[12]);
>>
>> I'd just drop this wrapper
> 
> Good point, I believe this is only used in a single location.
> transport_generic_allocate_tasks().
> 
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  /*	transport_set_supported_SAM_opcode():
>>>   *
>>>   *
>>> @@ -4370,6 +4386,23 @@ type_disk:
>>>  		    (cdb[12] << 8) + cdb[13];
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +/*
>>> + * Used for VARIABLE_LENGTH_CDB WRITE_32 and READ_32 variants
>>> + */
>>> +static inline u32 transport_get_sectors_32(
>>> +	unsigned char *cdb,
>>> +	struct se_cmd *cmd,
>>> +	int *ret)
>>> +{
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Assume TYPE_DISK for non struct se_device objects.
>>> +	 * Use 32-bit sector value.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	return (u32)(cdb[28] << 24) + (cdb[29] << 16) +
>>> +		    (cdb[30] << 8) + cdb[31];
>>> +
>>
>> get_unaligned_be32
> 
> Ok, there are a few more of these that can be converted to
> get_unaligned_be*() and friends.
> 
> Thanks for your comments Boaz!
> 
> --nab
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ