[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285058793.2275.799.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:46:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tracing/sched: Add sched_rt_push and sched_rt_pull
tracepoints
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 22:40 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
>
> Seeing how tasks are affected by the push/pull algorithm of the RT
> scheduler helps in understanding the migration of RT tasks.
>
> Adding these two tracepoints to show when an RT task is pushed from
> one CPU to another, or pulled helps with analyzing the way the
> scheduler works.
Why doesn't the migration tracepoint cover this? It shows you the task,
the prio, the old and new cpu. If the migration is logged from the old
cpu, its a push, if its logged from the new its a pull, no?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists