[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285060860.2617.158.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:21:00 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Regression, bisected: reference leak with IPSec since ~2.6.31
Le mardi 21 septembre 2010 à 09:12 +0000, Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> On 2010-09-20 23:31, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> ...
> > [PATCH] ip : fix truesize mismatch in ip fragmentation
> >
> > We should not set frag->destructor to sock_wkfree() until we are sure we
> > dont hit slow path in ip_fragment(). Or we risk uncharging
> > frag->truesize twice, and in the end, having negative socket
> > sk_wmem_alloc counter, or even freeing socket sooner than expected.
> >
> > Many thanks to Nick Bowler, who provided a very clean bug report and
> > test programs.
> >
> > While Nick bisection pointed to commit 2b85a34e911bf483 (net: No more
> > expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx), underlying bug is older.
> >
> > Reported-and-bisected-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > ---
> > net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 8 ++++----
> > net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > index 04b6989..126d9b3 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > @@ -490,7 +490,6 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
> > if (skb_has_frags(skb)) {
> > struct sk_buff *frag;
> > int first_len = skb_pagelen(skb);
> > - int truesizes = 0;
> >
> > if (first_len - hlen > mtu ||
> > ((first_len - hlen) & 7) ||
> > @@ -510,11 +509,13 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
> > goto slow_path;
> >
> > BUG_ON(frag->sk);
> > - if (skb->sk) {
> > + }
> > + if (skb->sk) {
> > + skb_walk_frags(skb, frag) {
> > frag->sk = skb->sk;
> > frag->destructor = sock_wfree;
>
> Nice catch, but it seems doing it in the first loop as now, and
> reverting changes before goto slow_path might be more optimal here.
>
I thought of this, but found this function already very complex.
Once everything is in cpu caches, the added loop is very cheap.
I liked the :
<check everything without changing state>
if something wrong
goto slow_path
else
<OK, lets do destructive things>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists