[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1009211144070.2416@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:45:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, Mitch Bradley <wmb@...top.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: of: define irq functions to allow drivers/of/*
to build on x86
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:21:35 -0600
> Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:14:58PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 06:01:51AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > - Define a stub irq_create_of_mapping for x86 as a stop-gap
> > > > > solution until drivers/of/irq is further along.
> > > > > - Define irq_dispose_mapping for x86 to appease of_i2c.c
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
> > > >
> > > > Applied to my test-devicetree branch. I'll need an ack from the
> > > > x86 maintainers before I put it into my -next branch.
> > >
> > > The purpose of the patch is not clear to me. What does it do and
> > > why?
> >
> > It allows CONFIG_OF to be enabled on x86 without a build failure.
> >
> > > The changelog says it's a stopgap measure - what exactly is the
> > > long term plan and how long will it take?
> >
> > It is a stop gap because it performs a trivial direct map of an IRQ
> > number in the device tree data structure to a Linux irq number. This
> > works for a single IRQ controller, but falls apart when cascaded
> > controller are described in the device tree. The long term plan is to
> > have the drivers/of/ code handling the mapping intelligently like
> > powerpc currently does.
> >
> > g.
> >
>
> Any additional comments (ACKs, NACKs, etc) on the patches? If I need
> to rework it (or them), I can certainly make the patch description
> longer.
Fine with me, but you could make the "mapping" function an inline as
well. While at it, some sensible changelog would be helpful :)
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists