[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285076187.23122.1809.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:36:27 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tracing/sched: Add sched_rt_push and sched_rt_pull
tracepoints
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:33 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Why doesn't the migration tracepoint cover this? It shows you the task,
> > the prio, the old and new cpu. If the migration is logged from the old
> > cpu, its a push, if its logged from the new its a pull, no?
>
> For some reason it did not help me enough in my analysis. I'll go back
> and see why.
>
> I originally had these tracepoints at the front of the series, and
> realized they may be a little controversial, thus I moved them to the
> end.
OK, I went back and looked, and I think you are right. I can determine
this from the migration tracepoint. I think I was just being lazy and
wanted to have the direction obvious to me :-) I can easily do that by
adding a plugin.
Anyway, I'll remove this patch and rename the sched_rt_setprio
tracepoint to sched_pi_setprio. Would that be OK with you?
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists