[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100921100522.be252b3d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:05:22 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: robm@...tmail.fm, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Bron Gondwana" <brong@...tmail.fm>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: Default zone_reclaim_mode = 1 on NUMA kernel is bad for
file/email/web servers
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:01:32 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Yes, sadly intel motherboard turn on zone_reclaim_mode by default. and
> current zone_reclaim_mode doesn't fit file/web server usecase ;-)
>
> So, I've created new proof concept patch. This doesn't disable zone_reclaim
> at all. Instead, distinguish for file cache and for anon allocation and
> only file cache doesn't use zone-reclaim.
>
> That said, high-end hpc user often turn on cpuset.memory_spread_page and
> they avoid this issue. But, why don't we consider avoid it by default?
>
>
> Rob, I wonder if following patch help you. Could you please try it?
>
>
> Subject: [RFC] vmscan: file cache doesn't use zone_reclaim by default
>
Hm, can't we use migration of file caches rather than pageout in
zone_reclaim_mode ? Doent' it fix anything ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists