[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285077801.2275.881.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:03:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com,
robert.richter@....com, acme@...hat.com,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] perf_events: add support for per-cpu
per-cgroup monitoring (v3)
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 15:38 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > Hmm, indeed. One thing we can do about that is move perf into the
> > cgroup, create the counter (disabled) using self to identify the cgroup,
> > move perf back to where it came from, and enable the counter.
> >
> Yes, that's another possibility. I wonder if there are any non-obvious
> difficulties with this approach.
Yes, there is, but I think we can fix it. The problem with moving perf
itself around is that perf is not a fully dormant process and can thus
interact with the cgroup state.
If we were to fork a child that's simply sitting idle in waitpid() (or
any other blocking syscall) we can move that around cgroup without
affecting the cgroup itself.
> Is it as simple as:
> FILE *fp;
> fp = fopen("/dev/cgroup/test/tasks", "w");
> fprintf(fp, "%d", gettid());
> close(fp):
Except I've never in my life mounted a cgroup filesystem in /dev/ :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists