[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100921185513.GA22929@dumpdata.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:55:13 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com,
rth@...hat.com, mhiramat@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, vgoyal@...hat.com,
sam@...nborg.org, tony@...eyournoodle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] jump label v11: base patch
> > +early_initcall(init_jump_label);
>
> Is there any danger of not patching the instructions with NOPs before
> early_initcall is called? I guess for your uses (tracing) there won't.
> And even if there are not patched it will just call the function.
Ah, nevermind - if you don't patch the addresses which are in
_jump_label section, the untouched code will just do far jump (jmpq)
to right after the macro, which is ok.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists