[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285098497.12764.18.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:48:17 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] led-class: always implement blinking
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 12:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:21:42 +0200
> Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
>
> > +static int led_blink_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> > + unsigned long *delay_on, unsigned long *delay_off)
> > + if (*delay_on == led_cdev->blink_delay_on &&
> > + *delay_off == led_cdev->blink_delay_off)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* deactivate previous settings */
> > + del_timer_sync(&led_cdev->blink_timer);
> > +
> > + led_cdev->blink_delay_on = *delay_on;
> > + led_cdev->blink_delay_off = *delay_off;
> delay_on and delay_off could have been pass-by-value rather than
> pass-by-reference? That would clean up some gunk in callers, too.
>
> If there was some reason for doing it with pass-by-reference then that
> reason should have been documented!
Well, this function gets assigned to led_cdev->blink_set(), which is a
function pointer that takes pass-by-reference arguments. The comment
there says:
/* Activate hardware accelerated blink, delays are in
* miliseconds and if none is provided then a sensible default
* should be chosen. The call can adjust the timings if it can't
* match the values specified exactly. */
int (*blink_set)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
unsigned long *delay_on,
unsigned long *delay_off);
but the software implementation doesn't adjust the timings, of course. I
suppose the "adjust the timings" was also meant to update the values.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists