linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] input: CMA3000 Accelerometer driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:16:25 +0530
From:	"Hemanth V" <hemanthv@...com>
To:	"Jonathan Cameron" <kernel@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	<linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] input: CMA3000 Accelerometer driver

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Cameron" <kernel@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
To: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "Hemanth V" <hemanthv@...com>; <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>; 
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] input: CMA3000 Accelerometer driver


> On 09/14/10 09:00, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:37:40PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm happy to see your driver go in as it is currently, what bothers me 
>>> is that we will end
>>> up with incompatible interfaces for all the accelerometers Dmitry takes!
>>>
>>
>> This is a valid concern. How about I chicken out and will not merge any
>> new sysfs knobs until you guys decide on reasonable interface? Most set
>> up is done by board code anyways, sysfs is more of nice-to-have?
> Hemanth, would removing the sysfs hooks from this driver be ok with you?
> I'd personally have favoured a merge, add new interfaces when agreed and
> deprecate old ones approach, but it is Dmitry's call.  Perhaps it is 
> better
> to get the majority of the device functionality in place now and add
> the bells and whistles later.
>
> For input device things are probably mostly fixed for a particular board
> design.  There are definitely interesting things one can do if the knobs
> are available but they (I think) mostly fall outside of using the device
> for input!
>

Dmitry, Jonathan

I am ok to remove the sysfs entries for now, but would cause some 
limitations
like not being able to change sampling frequency / disabling interrupts 
runtime.

Wanted to clarify if the intention is to come up with a standard sysfs 
interface
for all accelerometer drivers under input/misc including adxl34x.

Thanks
Hemanth 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/