[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C99E9E4.6040609@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:35:00 +0200
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
CC: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tcm/pscsi: Add proper BIDI-COMMAND passthrough to
SCSI MidLayer
On 09/22/2010 01:13 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 09/22/2010 08:08 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
<snip>
>> return task->task_sg_num;
>
> OK Now I'm sure!
> You have completely missed the fact that bidi entails two sg_list(s)
> two sg_num(s) and two io_byte_count(s).
>
> The use of sg_table will clear that confusion a bit, though I wanted it
> to carry an io_byte_count as well, but never came to do that.
>
OK actually you should use scsi_data_buffer better then sg_table. Because
it also has the length. And it even has a resid. Because with bidi-commands
there are two residual counters reported in command-response. You can see
libiscsi for how it handles the bidi residual counters.
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists