[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100922125202.GC5766@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:52:02 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, jbaron@...hat.com,
rostedt@...dmis.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, hpa@...or.com, roland@...hat.com,
rth@...hat.com, mhiramat@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, vgoyal@...hat.com,
sam@...nborg.org, tony@...eyournoodle.com,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add for_each_module iterator function
> > +void for_each_module(void (*op)(struct module *, void *arg), void *arg)
> > +{
> > + struct module *mod;
> > +
> > + preempt_disable();
>
> That wants rcu_read_lock()
Thanks. It was wrong anyways for the intended use case,
switched to module_mutex now.
BTW I think i copied this from somewhere else in module.c
Probably should be fixed there too.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists