linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] block fixes for 2.6.36-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTi=KGhG6jbAuFngw3p_rsJu944Kn+UUhYkhZ0vLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:06:40 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] block fixes for 2.6.36-rc5

Gaah. This is just _incredibly_ ugly:

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
>
> -       /* Add group onto cgroup list */
> -       sscanf(dev_name(bdi->dev), "%u:%u", &major, &minor);
> -       cfq_blkiocg_add_blkio_group(blkcg, &cfqg->blkg, (void *)cfqd,
> +       /*
> +        * Add group onto cgroup list. It might happen that bdi->dev is
> +        * not initiliazed yet. Initialize this new group without major
> +        * and minor info and this info will be filled in once a new thread
> +        * comes for IO. See code above.
> +        */
> +       if (bdi->dev) {
> +               sscanf(dev_name(bdi->dev), "%u:%u", &major, &minor);
> +               cfq_blkiocg_add_blkio_group(blkcg, &cfqg->blkg, (void *)cfqd,
>                                        MKDEV(major, minor));
> +       } else
> +               cfq_blkiocg_add_blkio_group(blkcg, &cfqg->blkg, (void *)cfqd,
> +                                       0);
> +

and quite frankly, anything that does that kind of thing is total
sh*t. Not only is the sscanf() just broken (really? figuring out
things from some internal string? Using dev_t in this time and age for
kernel internal stuff?) to begin with, but if you have to then do it
conditionally, for chrissake do it _cleanly_.

Make a small helper function that does "get me the dev_t of this
'dev'", and make that one do

   static unsigned int device_dev_t(struct device *dev)
   {
      unsigned int major = 0, minor = 0;

      if (dev)
         sscanf(dev_name(bdi->dev), "%u:%u", &major, &minor);

      return MKDEV(major, minor);
   }

and then just have a single 'cfq_blkiocg_add_blkio_group()' there.

But more seriously, why the hell does anything internal to cfq use a
'dev_t' in the first place? Why isn't that 'struct blkio_group' using
a pointer to the 'struct device' or something like that instead (or
the pointer to the queue, or whatever)? It's just damn wrong to use
dev_t in this day and age, and the fact that you need to make it up
using sscanf() should have clued people into that fact.

I hate seeing obvious crap-workarounds this late in an -rc.

                            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/