[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C9A4A4F.3060909@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:26:23 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yinghai@...nel.org,
just.for.lkml@...glemail.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: Early console confusion
On 09/22/2010 11:21 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> I think earlycon and earlyprintk have minimal backwards compatibility
> problems, since they're mostly for developers. And if we decided
> we did need to keep them, they could be undocumented and implemented
> on top of "console=" with the appropriate explicit device.
>
The problem is that they're actually hard-coded into the firmware of
some embedded devices.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists