[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100922184144.GA11741@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:41:44 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: memory barrier question
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 07:59:10AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:40:55PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 08:26:14AM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> > > On 21/09/10 06:25, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >But do we really care about Alpha anymore? (I can see it now... The
> > > >Alpha portion of the kernel tree moves to staging...)
> > >
> > > I do.
> > >
> > > Sent from my Compaq Alpha XP1000 :-)
> >
> > In that case, an smp_read_barrier_depends() or rcu_dereference() is
> > also required...
>
> Wait a minute... I finally got a chance to look up the system. This
> system has only a single Alpha CPU, right?
>
> If so, just build a UP kernel and be happy. No need to worry about
> any of these SMP issues.
>
> So, an alternative proposal -- support only UP kernels on Alpha. ;-)
And there do seem to be some SMP Alpha systems still in use:
http://www.alphalinux.org/wiki/index.php/User:Armin76/HW_list
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists