[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1285187901.1849.85.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:38:21 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Bernard Metzler <BMT@...ich.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] siw: Add support for CRC32C offload instruction
using libcrypto crc32c-intel
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On 9/22/2010 10:30 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger<nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> >
> > This patch updates siw_create_qp() to check for the CONFIG_X86 + cpu_has_xmm4_2
> > dependent use of the CRC32C instruction offload using libcrypto crc32c-intel.ko.
> > This patch will by default use crc32c-intel when available, and fall back to the
> > legacy slicing by 1x libcrypto crc32c.ko code when the instruction offload is not
> > availabe.
>
> I don't think every caller should handle checks like this. The crypto
> layer should load the right driver
> instead and provide the best driver under a generic algorithm name.
>
Indeed, this would clean up the explict RX/TX CRC32C case quite a bit..
Unfortuately I am too busy with other items atm to cook up this patch,
but I would be happy to test it if someone wants to take it. ;)
> Need CPUID module auto probing. I have an older patch that needs some fixes.
>
Hmm, I don't see how that fits in here exactly. Would you mind
elaborating a bit..?
Thanks!
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists