[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1285194989.1849.130.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:36:29 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Bernard Metzler <BMT@...ich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] siw: Add support for CRC32C offload instruction
using libcrypto crc32c-intel
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 16:06 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:38:31PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>
> > So I think the main bit here is the ability to request
> > crc32c-intel.ko first, and then fall back to crc32c.ko when the
> > former is not available on CONFIG_X86.
>
> Well, it is what Andi said, everything is working fine but there is no
> mechanism to autoload the accelerated crypto module. If you did
> modprobe crc32c_intel prior to loading your driver it would
> automatically get crc32c-intel when it asks for crc32c since it is
> loaded and a higher priority.
>
Ah, OK. I see what you mean now here wrt to libcrypto priorities and
crc32c + crc32c_intel modules. My apologies for the in-experience with
libcrypto here..
> So, the drivers are correct to just request crc32c .. The work around
> to limited autoprobing is so trivial (modprob crc32_intel) I'm not
> sure including extra autoprobing code in the drivers is worthwhile?
>
Indeed, I am happy to drop this patch if Bernard would be nice enough to
add a 'modprobe crc32_intel' into the SIW scripts.
Thanks for your comments Jason!
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists