[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100922232110.GC26268@shell>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:21:11 -0400
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
neilb@...e.de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7 v3] overlay: hybrid overlay filesystem prototype
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:04:10PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>
> This overlay filesystem is a hybrid of entirely filesystem based
> (unionfs, aufs) and entierly VFS based (union mounts) solutions.
[...]
> +static int ovl_copy_up_data(struct path *old, struct path *new, loff_t len)
> +{
> + struct file *old_file;
> + struct file *new_file;
> + int error = 0;
> +
> + if (len == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + old_file = path_open(old, O_RDONLY);
> + if (IS_ERR(old_file))
> + return PTR_ERR(old_file);
> +
> + new_file = path_open(new, O_WRONLY);
> + if (IS_ERR(new_file)) {
> + error = PTR_ERR(new_file);
> + goto out_fput;
> + }
> +
> + /* FIXME: copy up sparse files efficiently */
> + while (len) {
> + loff_t offset = new_file->f_pos;
> + size_t this_len = OVL_COPY_UP_CHUNK_SIZE;
> + long bytes;
> +
> + if (len < this_len)
> + this_len = len;
> +
> + if (signal_pending_state(TASK_KILLABLE, current))
> + return -EINTR;
> +
> + bytes = do_splice_direct(old_file, &offset, new_file, this_len,
> + SPLICE_F_MOVE);
Interruptible copyup is good. But it looks like splice setup is kind
of heavyweight and we should do it as seldom as possible.
What about implementing splice flag SPLICE_F_INTERRUPTIBLE instead?
-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists