[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201009230840.11724.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:40:11 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, gregf@...newdream.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/locks.c: prepare for BKL removal
On Thursday 23 September 2010 05:42:49 Sage Weil wrote:
> Okay, the lock/unlock_flocks() stubs on in Linus' tree now, and the Ceph
> for-next branch is rebased and updated to fix the memory allocations and
> switch to the new interface.
Ok. I'll put the patches for the other stuff (everything but ceph and lockd)
in my bkl/vfs branch then.
> Unfortunately you still need to #include smp_lock.h for now since the
> stubs are just #defines, so we'll need to remember to clean that up later.
Don't worry about that. We have a few of those leftover ones, so we can
do a single patch removing them all before one day removing the header
file itself.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists