lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C9B497B.4060302@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:35:07 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC] workqueue: remove in_workqueue_context()

Commit a25909a4 (lockdep: Add an in_workqueue_context() lockdep-based
test function) added in_workqueue_context() but there hasn't been any
in-kernel user and the lockdep annotation in workqueue is scheduled to
change.  Remove the unused function.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Paul, I was looking through lockdep annotations to see how they can be
improved and noticed that in_workqueue_context() isn't used by anyone
and it seems like there hasn't been any in-kernel user either.  Can
this be removed or do you expect to use it somewhere?

Thanks.

 include/linux/workqueue.h |    4 ----
 kernel/workqueue.c        |   15 ---------------
 2 files changed, 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index e33ff4a..f6eaf56 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -429,8 +429,4 @@ extern bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void);
 extern void thaw_workqueues(void);
 #endif /* CONFIG_FREEZER */

-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-int in_workqueue_context(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
-#endif
-
 #endif
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 19e4bc1..c758e78 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -310,21 +310,6 @@ static inline int __next_wq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask,
 	     (cpu) < WORK_CPU_NONE;					\
 	     (cpu) = __next_wq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, (wq)))

-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-/**
- * in_workqueue_context() - in context of specified workqueue?
- * @wq: the workqueue of interest
- *
- * Checks lockdep state to see if the current task is executing from
- * within a workqueue item.  This function exists only if lockdep is
- * enabled.
- */
-int in_workqueue_context(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
-{
-	return lock_is_held(&wq->lockdep_map);
-}
-#endif
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK

 static struct debug_obj_descr work_debug_descr;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ