[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009231209450.32567@router.home>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:12:55 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] hugetlb: move refcounting in hugepage allocation
inside hugetlb_lock
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> Currently alloc_huge_page() raises page refcount outside hugetlb_lock.
> but it causes race when dequeue_hwpoison_huge_page() runs concurrently
> with alloc_huge_page().
> To avoid it, this patch moves set_page_refcounted() in hugetlb_lock.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
One wonders though how many other of these huge races are still there
though.
"Normal" page migration is based on LRU isolation and therefore does not
suffer from these problems on allocation since the page is not yet on the
LRU. Also the LRU isolation is a known issue due to memory reclaim doing
this. This protection is going away of one goes directly to a page
without going through the LRU. That should create more races...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists