[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100923183724.GS23040@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:37:24 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Tomáš Janoušek <tomi@...i.cz>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
glommer@...hat.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, zamsden@...hat.com,
stable@...nel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com, gregkh@...e.de,
peter@...frader.org, tglx@...utronix.de, avi@...hat.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Add memory modify constraints
to xchg() and cmpxchg()
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:10:35PM +0200, Tomáš Janoušek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:15:16PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > The system boots and works just fine with 2.6.32.21 with the patch reverted.
> > > v2.6.36-rc3-185-gd56557a works fine as well, perhaps there were other fixes
> > > that didn't get to stable (e.g. 4532b30).
> >
> > I believe this needs 69309a05907546fb686b251d4ab041c26afe1e1d, which I
> > think is being queued up for stable.
> >
> > Could you try applying 69309a05907546fb686b251d4ab041c26afe1e1d and see
> > if it solves your problem.
>
> It does indeed. Thanks.
Hm, that patch doesn't apply to the latest .32-stable tree. Can someone
provide me with a backported version so I make sure I get it correct?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists