linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] intel_ips: quieten "power or thermal limit exceeded" messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1285274825.25928.19.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date:	Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:47:05 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc:	Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_ips: quieten "power or thermal limit exceeded"
 messages

On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 13:31 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> I think the programmed limits are valid if they're nonzero and less
> than one of the available default limits.  If they're not valid, we
> should just use the default values.  I was thinking something like the
> below for MCP, but Joe you may want to just update your patch instead
> since it's more complete.

You have my patch yes?

You can probably integrate and validate it
better than I can with your proposed change.

I don't have any of the hardware to test.
If I can otherwise help somehow, let me know.

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/