[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285336460.31083.10.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:54:20 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] jump label: Base patch for jump label
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 14:40 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> I agree that we this synchronization for the module __init section.
>
> However, I believe we are ok for module removal case. free_module() is
> called *after* blocking_notifier_call_chain() call. The
> blocking_notifier_call_chain() is going to call back into the jump label
> code, grab the jump_label_mutex and remove the reference to the module that
> is about to freed. Thus, the jump label code can no longer reference it.
>
> So I think the following patch is all that is required here (lightly
> tested).
>
> Steve, I'll re-post as a separate patch, if we agree on this fix.
Ug, I'm struggling to get ready for my Tokyo trip. I'll try to look at
it on the flight. But I still need to write my presentation :-)
I may have a response back till Monday or Tuesday.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists