[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1285337818.13976.697.camel@bigi>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:16:58 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] net: Allow setting the network namespace by fd
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:09 +0200, David Lamparter wrote:
> I understood your point. What I'm saying is that that functional graph
> you're describing is too simplistic do be a workable model. Your graph
> allows for what you're trying to do, yes. But your graph is not modeling
> the reality.
How about we put this specific point to rest by agreeing to
disagree? ;->
> Err... I'm migrating netdevs to assign them to namespaces to allow them
> to use them? Setup, basically. Either way a device move only happens as
> result of some administrative action; be it creating a new namespace or
> changing the physical/logical network setup.
>
Ok, different need. You have a much more basic requirement than i do.
> wtf is a "remote" namespace?
>
A namespace that is remotely located on another machine/hardware ;->
> Can you please describe your application that requires moving possibly
> several network devices together with "their" routes to a different
> namespace?
scaling and availability are the driving requirements.
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists