lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100924162618.799321556@clark.site>
Date:	Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:24:33 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
Subject: [45/80] vmscan: check all_unreclaimable in direct reclaim path

2.6.35-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>

commit d1908362ae0b97374eb8328fbb471576332f9fb1 upstream.

M.  Vefa Bicakci reported 2.6.35 kernel hang up when hibernation on his
32bit 3GB mem machine.
(https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771). Also he bisected
the regression to

  commit bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
  Author: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
  Date:   Fri Jun 4 14:15:05 2010 -0700

     vmscan: fix do_try_to_free_pages() return value when priority==0 reclaim failure

At first impression, this seemed very strange because the above commit
only chenged function return value and hibernate_preallocate_memory()
ignore return value of shrink_all_memory().  But it's related.

Now, page allocation from hibernation code may enter infinite loop if the
system has highmem.  The reasons are that vmscan don't care enough OOM
case when oom_killer_disabled.

The problem sequence is following as.

1. hibernation
2. oom_disable
3. alloc_pages
4. do_try_to_free_pages
       if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && !all_unreclaimable)
               return 1;

If kswapd is not freozen, it would set zone->all_unreclaimable to 1 and
then shrink_zones maybe return true(ie, all_unreclaimable is true).  So at
last, alloc_pages could go to _nopage_.  If it is, it should have no
problem.

This patch adds all_unreclaimable check to protect in direct reclaim path,
too.  It can care of hibernation OOM case and help bailout
all_unreclaimable case slightly.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Reported-by: M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@...eronline.com>
Reported-by: <caiqian@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Tested-by: <caiqian@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 mm/vmscan.c |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1726,13 +1726,12 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, st
  * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
  * scan then give up on it.
  */
-static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
+static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 					struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	enum zone_type high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask);
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	struct zone *zone;
-	bool all_unreclaimable = true;
 
 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx,
 					sc->nodemask) {
@@ -1759,8 +1758,38 @@ static bool shrink_zones(int priority, s
 		}
 
 		shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
-		all_unreclaimable = false;
 	}
+}
+
+static bool zone_reclaimable(struct zone *zone)
+{
+	return zone->pages_scanned < zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6;
+}
+
+/*
+ * As hibernation is going on, kswapd is freezed so that it can't mark
+ * the zone into all_unreclaimable. It can't handle OOM during hibernation.
+ * So let's check zone's unreclaimable in direct reclaim as well as kswapd.
+ */
+static bool all_unreclaimable(struct zonelist *zonelist,
+		struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	struct zoneref *z;
+	struct zone *zone;
+	bool all_unreclaimable = true;
+
+	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
+			gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
+		if (!populated_zone(zone))
+			continue;
+		if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
+			continue;
+		if (zone_reclaimable(zone)) {
+			all_unreclaimable = false;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
 	return all_unreclaimable;
 }
 
@@ -1784,7 +1813,6 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_page
 					struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	int priority;
-	bool all_unreclaimable;
 	unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
 	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
 	unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
@@ -1815,7 +1843,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_page
 		sc->nr_scanned = 0;
 		if (!priority)
 			disable_swap_token();
-		all_unreclaimable = shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
+		shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
 		/*
 		 * Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
 		 * over limit cgroups
@@ -1879,7 +1907,7 @@ out:
 		return sc->nr_reclaimed;
 
 	/* top priority shrink_zones still had more to do? don't OOM, then */
-	if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && !all_unreclaimable)
+	if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && !all_unreclaimable(zonelist, sc))
 		return 1;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -2137,8 +2165,7 @@ loop_again:
 			total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned;
 			if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
 				continue;
-			if (nr_slab == 0 &&
-			    zone->pages_scanned >= (zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6))
+			if (nr_slab == 0 && !zone_reclaimable(zone))
 				zone->all_unreclaimable = 1;
 			/*
 			 * If we've done a decent amount of scanning and


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ