[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100924200218.GC25677@one-eyed-alien.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:02:18 -0700
From: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@...-eyed-alien.net>
To: matt mooney <mfm@...eddisk.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>
Subject: Re: [usb-storage] [PATCH 23/24] usb: change to new flag variable
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:17:33PM -0700, matt mooney wrote:
> Replace EXTRA_CFLAGS with ccflags-y.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/Makefile b/drivers/usb/storage/Makefile
> index ef7e5a8..786f086 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/Makefile
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> # Rewritten to use lists instead of if-statements.
> #
>
> -EXTRA_CFLAGS := -Idrivers/scsi
> +ccflags-y := -Idrivers/scsi
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_STORAGE) += usb-storage.o
I don't really know anything about the new 'ccflags' stuff.. but my
instincts tell me that perhaps that should be
'ccflags-$(CONFIG_USB_STORAGE)' rather than 'ccflags-y'?
Does it make a difference that usb-storage can be built-in or a loadable
module?
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@...-eyed-alien.net
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
I could always suspend a few hundred accounts and watch what happens.
-- Tanya
User Friendly, 7/31/1998
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists