linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][Patch] IBM Real-Time "SMI Free" mode driver -v5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100924143518.d475a039.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date:	Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:35:18 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Vernon Mauery <vernux@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Keith Mannthey <kmannth@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch] IBM Real-Time "SMI Free" mode driver -v5

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:30:09 -0700 Vernon Mauery wrote:

> >> +/* The RTL table as presented by the EBDA: */
> >> +struct ibm_rtl_table {
> >> +	char signature[5];
> >
> >Question:  are all 5 bytes of signature[] used?  It looks like the search code
> >only checks for 32 bits of signature (and the last byte can be garbage?).
> 
> Technically, the 5 bytes are supposed to be "_RTL_", but it is a lot 
> easier to just check _RTL since we can do that with a single read.  I 
> suppose I could do a 64-bit read and mask the bits that matter.  Do you 
> have an opinion on the matter?

I would just comment that the first 4 bytes are checked.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/