[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100924.212702.116381928.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: linux@...nbow-software.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: de4x5 hangs with SMP: synchronize_irq() in interrupt handler?
From: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:30:49 +0200
> I'm trying to get two Compex FreedomLine 32 PnP-PCI2 cards to work (21041-AA
> and 21041-PA) - there are problems with de2104x driver (one of the cards does
> not work at all and the other one switches to non-existing AUI port when the
> link goes down and never switches back to RJ45) and I know that de4x5 driver
> worked for me in past.
>
> Loading de4x5 causes the machine to hang immediately. It hangs at
> synchronize_irq() call from de4x5_interrupt(). Commenting out this allows the
> driver to work. Without SMP, synchronize_irq() is redefined to barrier() so
> it works.
>
> I don't have a clue how to fix this properly - does anyone know?
This driver is an enormous mess.
Someone half-converted the driver over to use a spinlock to protect
the interrupt handler and other parts of the driver, but that
conversion is so obvsiously buggy that I can't see how it was
ever tested.
All of the tests on lp->interrupt are racy, nothing protects the
setting and testing of that value. It is set with lp->lock held
but tested asynchronously by the driver's ->ndo_start_xmit
method.
It uses this value to determine if it should queue the packet into
a software queue that gets processed at the end of the interrupt
processing.
Problem is, that code path deadlocks, the end of de4x5_interrupt
pulls the packets out of that queue in a loop, and sends them
to the function named de4x5_queue_pkt().
Which tries to take the lp->lock spinlock, which is already held
by de4x5_interrupt().
This driver needs major surgery to get into a working state on
SMP.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists