[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285526141.3047.0.camel@cowboy>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:35:41 -0400
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Tracey Dent <tdent48227@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] Fs: ext4: namei: fixed file of checkpatch/pl
warnings and errors
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 14:23 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 08:36:34AM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> >
> > BTW I wouldn't trust checkpatch so blindly. Also keep in mind checkpatch
> > is only a tool and that maintainers have full authority to ignore the
> > problems (or "problems") it spews.
>
> I'm beginning to think we need to have an entry in the kernel newbie's
> FAQ warning people that the output of various scripts such as
> checkpatch and get_maintainer are not authoratative, and are
> hueristics intended to be supplemented by human intelligence.
It would actually be quite useful to add a warning in kernelnewbies
about this, some people tend to get too carried away :)
Davidlohr
>
> - TEd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists