[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100927081358.07b30327@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:13:58 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>,
"Cahill, Ben M" <ben.m.cahill@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwl3945: queue the right work if the scan needs to be
aborted
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:51:08 -0700
"Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> Thanks for sending the patch, the scan operation in iwlwifi just being
> modified and the changes you have no longer apply.please check the
> latest kernel.
>
> Thanks
> Wey
>
Ok, I checked out
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-2.6.git
and it definitely looks better in there. This patch shouldn't be
necessary for that.
Do you plan on submitting this for 2.6.36 or .37?
I think my patch should fix the instance reported in the bug in a less
invasive manner.
Only remaining question is why it did only show up now. But that's
probably due to the workqueue changes.
Regards,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists