linux-kernel - Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] Swsusp patches applied to suspend-2.6#linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100927065946.GR7007@wrars-comp.wrarsdomain>
Date:	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:59:46 +0600
From:	Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@...linux.org>
To:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	TuxOnIce-devel <tuxonice-devel@...onice.net>
Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] Swsusp patches applied to suspend-2.6#linux-next

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:43:35PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi again Rafael.
> 
> As discussed, here are the patches, modified to apply against your current
> linux-next tree. A new first patch splits compression support out into its
> own file, removing the need to have two versions of the load_image and
> save_image routines, minimising the changes to the remainder of the
> patches and making things cleaner than would otherwise be the case.
> 
> On my laptop, single-threaded compression actually slows writing down from
> 175MB/s to around 100-120MB/s (depending on how well the image compresses).
> Reading speed improves from 218MB/s to around 245MB/s. I expect that
> multithreaded writing would bring the writing (and reading) speeds back
> up. It's on my swsusp to do list :)
Can I test this patchset by just building for-rafael branch?

-- 
WBR, wRAR (ALT Linux Team)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)