[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CA055EF.6050608@tuxonice.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:29:35 +1000
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
To: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@...linux.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
TuxOnIce-devel <tuxonice-devel@...onice.net>
Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] Swsusp patches applied to suspend-2.6#linux-next
Hi.
On 27/09/10 18:00, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:43:35PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>> Hi again Rafael.
>>
>> As discussed, here are the patches, modified to apply against your current
>> linux-next tree. A new first patch splits compression support out into its
>> own file, removing the need to have two versions of the load_image and
>> save_image routines, minimising the changes to the remainder of the
>> patches and making things cleaner than would otherwise be the case.
>>
>> On my laptop, single-threaded compression actually slows writing down from
>> 175MB/s to around 100-120MB/s (depending on how well the image compresses).
>> Reading speed improves from 218MB/s to around 245MB/s. I expect that
>> multithreaded writing would bring the writing (and reading) speeds back
>> up. It's on my swsusp to do list :)
> Works here.
Ah. You're too fast for me :)
What sort of speeds are you seeing?
Regards,
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists