lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100927104804.6377.15062.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:48:04 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	linux-am33-list@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] mn10300: Get rid of set_fs(USER_DS) in sigframe setup

From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>

The set_fs(USER_DS) in the signal frame setup code really has no business
being there; short of a serious kernel bug we should already have USER_DS at
that point.  It shouldn't have been done on x86 either...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---

 arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c |    4 ----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
index 5a2c004..ae36480 100644
--- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
@@ -333,8 +333,6 @@ static int setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set,
 	regs->d0 = sig;
 	regs->d1 = (unsigned long) &frame->sc;
 
-	set_fs(USER_DS);
-
 	/* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */
 	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
 		ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
@@ -416,8 +414,6 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
 	regs->d0 = sig;
 	regs->d1 = (long) &frame->info;
 
-	set_fs(USER_DS);
-
 	/* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */
 	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
 		ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ