[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100927104804.6377.15062.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:48:04 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-am33-list@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] mn10300: Get rid of set_fs(USER_DS) in sigframe setup
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
The set_fs(USER_DS) in the signal frame setup code really has no business
being there; short of a serious kernel bug we should already have USER_DS at
that point. It shouldn't have been done on x86 either...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c | 4 ----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
index 5a2c004..ae36480 100644
--- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c
@@ -333,8 +333,6 @@ static int setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set,
regs->d0 = sig;
regs->d1 = (unsigned long) &frame->sc;
- set_fs(USER_DS);
-
/* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
@@ -416,8 +414,6 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
regs->d0 = sig;
regs->d1 = (long) &frame->info;
- set_fs(USER_DS);
-
/* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists