linux-kernel - Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] Swsusp patches applied to suspend-2.6#linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100927111631.GA6759@wrars-comp.wrarsdomain>
Date:	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:16:31 +0600
From:	Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@...linux.org>
To:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	TuxOnIce-devel <tuxonice-devel@...onice.net>
Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] Swsusp patches applied to suspend-2.6#linux-next

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:29:35PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> >> On my laptop, single-threaded compression actually slows writing down from
> >> 175MB/s to around 100-120MB/s (depending on how well the image compresses).
> >> Reading speed improves from 218MB/s to around 245MB/s. I expect that
> >> multithreaded writing would bring the writing (and reading) speeds back
> >> up. It's on my swsusp to do list :)
> > Works here.
> What sort of speeds are you seeing?
[  343.549378] PM: Image written at 107 MB/s.
[  343.549379] PM: Image read at 205 MB/s.
Latest ToI (on .35; with the lzo compressor; no clue about
multithreadedness, though there are 4 CPUs here): I/O speed: Write 166
MB/s, Read 192 MB/s.

-- 
WBR, wRAR (ALT Linux Team)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)