[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100927180558.52817d5f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:05:58 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] ptp: IEEE 1588 hardware clock support
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:56:09 -0500 (CDT)
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Whether you add new syscalls or do the fd passing using flags and hide
> > the ugly bits in glibc is another question.
>
> Use device specific ioctls instead of syscalls?
Some of the ioctls are probably not device specific, the job of the OS in
part is to present a unified interface. We already have a mess of HPET
and RTC driver ioctls.
Some of it undoubtedly is device specific.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists