[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D530160471328@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:01:51 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-cris-kernel@...s.com" <linux-cris-kernel@...s.com>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC trollpatch 1/1] genirq: Remove the fits all and nothing
__do_IRQ() code
>> handle_level_irq() works for my level triggered interrupts if I add
>> a "desc->chip->end(irq)" call to it.
>
> Hmm, why isn't chip->unmask() sufficient ?
That's a good question. I'll take a look at what ia64 is doing
in the ->unmask() and ->end() functions to see if I can fix this
with some code shuffling.
Thanks
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists