[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100927212650.62859ee0@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:26:50 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: get_maintainer.pl: append reason for cc to the name by
default
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:21:24 -0400
Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> (I've argued for not even trying, but clearly
> people who have tried to argue for that have lost that battle; enough
> people seem to think it's worth while to make wild guesses even though
> the script is called get_maintainer.pl, and not
> get_maintainer_or_make_wild_stabs_in_the_dark.pl.)
>
> - Ted
Actually, I think get_maintainer_or_make_wild_stabs_in_the_dark.pl is
a better strategy to ensure that a patch doesn't get ignored then
to ... well.. do nothing.
> P.S. Wouldn't it be better to train kernel newbies how to read
> through the output of git log themselves? I'm not sure that training
> people to rely blindly on dumb scripts is in the end actually going to
> be doing ourselves and the whole community a service. Sigh....
Yes and no. Reaching out to people is something kernel newbies
need to learn too...
I'd agree if the end result of get_maintainer.pl would be to send it to
random machines... but we actually give out
addresses of human beings, so I don't think it is _that_ bad an idea.
But we should definitely try to tune down the annoying part of
it by making it less random and maybe by adding a tag in the cc field...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists