linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/23] Record & display i/o speed post resume.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201009272206.20020.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:06:19 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
Cc:	Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"TuxOnIce-devel" <tuxonice-devel@...onice.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] Record & display i/o speed post resume.

On Monday, September 27, 2010, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Record the speed at which the image is written and read, and
> display it to the user post-resume.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
> ---
>  kernel/power/hibernate.c |   11 ++++++++++-
>  kernel/power/power.h     |    3 ++-
>  kernel/power/swap.c      |   14 +++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> index 6c9c9dc..0cd1f05 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static void platform_recover(int platform_mode)
>   *	@msg -		introductory message to print
>   */
>  
> -void swsusp_show_speed(struct timeval *start, struct timeval *stop,
> +int swsusp_show_speed(struct timeval *start, struct timeval *stop,
>  			unsigned nr_pages, char *msg)
>  {
>  	s64 elapsed_centisecs64;
> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ void swsusp_show_speed(struct timeval *start, struct timeval *stop,
>  			msg, k,
>  			centisecs / 100, centisecs % 100,
>  			kps / 1000, (kps % 1000) / 10);
> +	return kps / 1000;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -648,6 +649,14 @@ int hibernate(void)
>  			power_down();
>  	} else {
>  		pr_debug("PM: Image restored successfully.\n");
> +		if (write_speed)
> +			pr_debug("PM: Image written at %u MB/s.\n",
> +					(u8) write_speed);
> +		write_speed = 0;
> +		if (read_speed)
> +			pr_debug("PM: Image read at %u MB/s.\n",
> +					(u8) read_speed);
> +		read_speed = 0;
>  	}
>  
>   Thaw:
> diff --git a/kernel/power/power.h b/kernel/power/power.h
> index 03634be..22f8607 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/power.h
> +++ b/kernel/power/power.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ extern int hibernation_snapshot(int platform_mode);
>  extern int hibernation_restore(int platform_mode);
>  extern int hibernation_platform_enter(void);
>  
> +extern char __nosavedata write_speed, read_speed;
>  #else /* !CONFIG_HIBERNATION */
>  
>  static inline void hibernate_image_size_init(void) {}
> @@ -161,7 +162,7 @@ extern int hib_wait_on_bio_chain(struct bio **bio_chain);
>  
>  struct timeval;
>  /* kernel/power/swsusp.c */
> -extern void swsusp_show_speed(struct timeval *, struct timeval *,
> +extern int swsusp_show_speed(struct timeval *, struct timeval *,
>  				unsigned int, char *);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> diff --git a/kernel/power/swap.c b/kernel/power/swap.c
> index 3c01105..caf4db8 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/swap.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/swap.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ struct swap_map_page {
>  };
>  
>  struct swsusp_header {
> -	char reserved[PAGE_SIZE - 20 - sizeof(sector_t) - sizeof(int)];
> +	char reserved[PAGE_SIZE - 21 - sizeof(sector_t) - sizeof(int)];
> +	char write_speed;
>  	sector_t image;
>  	unsigned int flags;	/* Flags to pass to the "boot" kernel */
>  	char	orig_sig[10];
> @@ -161,6 +162,7 @@ int swsusp_swap_in_use(void)
>  
>  static unsigned short root_swap = 0xffff;
>  struct block_device *hib_resume_bdev;
> +char __nosavedata write_speed, read_speed;

I really should have noticed that earlier, but I don't really like __nosavedata
being used here.  In fact, it shouldn't be used at all any more, because it's
meaningless on x86_64.

I'm not sure how to implement that without __nosavedata, but please don't
use it.  Sorry aboiut that.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/