| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:27:16 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com> To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>, "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon (coretemp): Fix build breakage if SMP is undefined On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:02:57AM -0400, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > > > > * Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com> wrote: > > > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > >> +#endif > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > >> +#endif > > > > Hm, this tickles my uglo-meter. Is there no cleaner way, preferably one > > that doesnt involve preprocessor directives? > > Implement cpu_sibling_mask() on UP so that the loop goes away? So what is the take ? Looks like Linus won't accept my patch without someone else signing off on it. If the uglo-meter prevents it from being accepted, I'll be happy to submit the SMP cleanup patch instead. As I mentioned before, I would prefer that to go into -next. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists