[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100927232716.GB4744@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:27:16 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon (coretemp): Fix build breakage if SMP is
undefined
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:02:57AM -0400, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > * Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >> +#endif
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >> +#endif
> >
> > Hm, this tickles my uglo-meter. Is there no cleaner way, preferably one
> > that doesnt involve preprocessor directives?
>
> Implement cpu_sibling_mask() on UP so that the loop goes away?
So what is the take ? Looks like Linus won't accept my patch without someone
else signing off on it. If the uglo-meter prevents it from being accepted,
I'll be happy to submit the SMP cleanup patch instead. As I mentioned
before, I would prefer that to go into -next.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists