linux-kernel - Swsusp patches applied to suspend-2.6#linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1285566238-10966-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net>
Date:	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:43:35 +1000
From:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	TuxOnIce-devel <tuxonice-devel@...onice.net>
Subject: Swsusp patches applied to suspend-2.6#linux-next

Hi again Rafael.

As discussed, here are the patches, modified to apply against your current
linux-next tree. A new first patch splits compression support out into its
own file, removing the need to have two versions of the load_image and
save_image routines, minimising the changes to the remainder of the
patches and making things cleaner than would otherwise be the case.

On my laptop, single-threaded compression actually slows writing down from
175MB/s to around 100-120MB/s (depending on how well the image compresses).
Reading speed improves from 218MB/s to around 245MB/s. I expect that
multithreaded writing would bring the writing (and reading) speeds back
up. It's on my swsusp to do list :)

Nigel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/