linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] secmark: export binary yes/no rather than kernel internal secid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CA1AB0F.908@googlemail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:45:03 +0100
From:	Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@...glemail.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
CC:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	sds@...ho.nsa.gov, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] secmark: export binary yes/no rather than kernel
 internal secid


>> In netlink, we can obsolete fields without breaking backward
>> compatibility. Applications parsing the /proc entry may break, but they
>> should use stable interfaces (like netlink) instead.
>>     
>
> Which I take as a pro stance on not adding any more procfs fields.
>   
How did you figure that one out then?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/