[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=m5ZtWhQ6Z69WPUkyvcqhmL1ewG1gZ0HUQB3LE@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:00:59 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon (coretemp): Fix build breakage if SMP is undefined
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Guenter Roeck
<guenter.roeck@...csson.com> wrote:
>
> Not that simple. cpu_sibling_mask() is defined in asm/smp.h, which is only
> included from linux/smp.h if SMP is defined. But many other files do include
> asm/smp.h directly. This causes the following error all over the place
> if CONFIG_SMP is not defined.
Yeah, that's broken. Seriously broken.
And I guess that if you had happened to include <asm/smp.h> in
coretemp.c you would magically have gotten that cpu_sibling_map()
thing, and it would just work - by mistake.
And maybe that's the correct (and really hacky) fix right now. Rather
than introduce an UP-only cpu_sibling_mask(), get the SMP version, and
get it ignored.
Seriously broken, but there it is.
In the long run, I guess we should either
- disallow naked '<asm/smp.h>' includes
OR
- just make '<linux/smp.h>' unconditionally include <asm/smp.h>
to at least not have that insane "some things exist in CONFIG_SMP or
not depending on how you include files".
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists