[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CA1E338.6070201@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:44:40 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] v2 De-Couple sysfs memory directories from memory
sections
On 09/27/2010 09:09 PM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> This set of patches decouples the concept that a single memory
> section corresponds to a single directory in
> /sys/devices/system/memory/. On systems
> with large amounts of memory (1+ TB) there are perfomance issues
> related to creating the large number of sysfs directories. For
> a powerpc machine with 1 TB of memory we are creating 63,000+
> directories. This is resulting in boot times of around 45-50
> minutes for systems with 1 TB of memory and 8 hours for systems
> with 2 TB of memory. With this patch set applied I am now seeing
> boot times of 5 minutes or less.
>
> The root of this issue is in sysfs directory creation. Every time
> a directory is created a string compare is done against all sibling
> directories to ensure we do not create duplicates. The list of
> directory nodes in sysfs is kept as an unsorted list which results
> in this being an exponentially longer operation as the number of
> directories are created.
>
> The solution solved by this patch set is to allow a single
> directory in sysfs to span multiple memory sections. This is
> controlled by an optional architecturally defined function
> memory_block_size_bytes(). The default definition of this
> routine returns a memory block size equal to the memory section
> size. This maintains the current layout of sysfs memory
> directories as it appears to userspace to remain the same as it
> is today.
>
Why not update sysfs directory creation to be fast, for example by using
an rbtree instead of a linked list. This fixes an implementation
problem in the kernel instead of working around it and creating a new ABI.
New ABIs mean old tools won't work, and new tools need to understand
both ABIs.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists