[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CA231FA.4070907@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:20:42 -0500
From: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com>
To: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] v2 Allow memory block to span multiple memory sections
On 09/28/2010 07:48 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>> +u32 __weak memory_block_size_bytes(void)
>> +{
>> + return MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 get_memory_block_size(void)
>
> Can we make this an unsigned long? We are testing on a system whose
> smallest possible configuration is 4GB per socket with 512 sockets.
> We would like to be able to specify this as 2GB by default (results
> in the least lost memory) and suggest we add a command line option
> which overrides this value. We have many installations where 16GB may
> be optimal. Large configurations will certainly become more prevalent.
Works for me.
>
> ...
>> @@ -551,12 +608,16 @@
>> unsigned int i;
>> int ret;
>> int err;
>> + int block_sz;
>
> This one needs to match the return above. In our tests, we ended up
> with a negative sections_per_block which caused very unexpected results.
Oh, nice catch. I'll update both of these.
-Nathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists