linux-kernel - Re: [stable] PROBLEM: [BISECTED] 2.6.35.5 xen domU panics just after the boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:29:10 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>,
	James Dingwall <james.dingwall@...ocs.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] PROBLEM: [BISECTED] 2.6.35.5 xen domU panics just
	after the boot

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:08:43AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>  On 09/26/2010 11:13 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:40:44PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:23:55PM +0100, James Dingwall wrote:
> >>>> I was experiencing the same immediate crash with a null pointer
> >>>> dereference (log below) on boot with 2.6.35.5.  Reverting
> >>>> fb412a178502dc498430723b082a932f797e4763 also resolved the problem for
> >>>> me.
> >>> Checking the diff from this commit it looks like there is a typo in the patch.  With the following (probably mangled by my client) I get 2.6.35.5 to boot.  Suggest it should be a candidate for .32 and .35 stable trees.
> >>>
> >> Greg, a spelling mistake cropped into this patch during 2.6.35.5 that
> >> James here points out. Adding you to CC since it seems to have missed
> >> stable 2.6.35.6...
> >>
> >> Was in xen-use-percpu-interrupts-for-ipis-and-virqs.patch.
> > I don't understand, where did the error come from?  Was it in a patch I
> > applied, or did I mess up some patch?  Is the same problem upstream, and
> > if not, why not?
> 
> I don't know.  It looks like an 'x' was deleted due to an editor
> fat-finger or something.  The original upstream patches were cc:d to
> stable, so I think you would have got them that way (ie, I don't think I
> sent them to you specifically).  Is there an opportunity in your
> workflow where this error could have crept in?  The patches should have
> been a pretty clean 'git cherry-pick' with no conflicts.

Sorry, I don't know what happened, using my scripts, it does drop to an
editor so I can add the "signed-off-by" line, so perhaps I accidentally
did this in there.

It's now in the -stable queue and I'll push out new releases in a few
hours.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/